AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Prime Big Deal Days · Oct 6–7Offer from Amazon

Get art and craft supplies delivered free — and shop member deals

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Hyperallergic published Lucy Ives’s review of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Lee Krasner and Jackson Pollock show. Ives describes the exhibition as an “upending” of her expectations, but the supplied report does not detail the show’s contents, dates or specific argument in the review.

Hyperallergic has published critic Lucy Ives’s review of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Lee Krasner and Jackson Pollock show, presenting it as a fresh reconsideration of the two artists. Ives writes, “I’ve never seen an upending quite like this,” though the newsletter summary does not specify what the exhibition changed in her view.

The review is part of a Hyperallergic newsletter edited by Editor-in-Chief Hakim Bishara. The newsletter identifies Ives as a novelist and critic and singles out her review as one of its main features. It does not provide a publication date for the review or the exhibition, nor does it reproduce Ives’s full assessment.

The newsletter includes an image caption for Lee Krasner’s Right Bird Left (1965), an oil painting on canvas. The credit names Valentina Di Liscia/Hyperallergic as the photographer. The provided material does not say whether this work appears in the exhibition or explain its role in Ives’s review.

The headline “Lee Krasner Gets the Last Word” frames the coverage around Krasner, while the newsletter describes the exhibition as a Krasner-Pollock show. Beyond Ives’s brief remark, the source excerpt offers no account of the artworks on view, the exhibition’s curatorial approach, or the review’s conclusions.

At a glance
reportWhen: Reported in Hyperallergic’s newsletter;…
The developmentHyperallergic’s newsletter highlights Lucy Ives’s review of the Met’s Lee Krasner and Jackson Pollock exhibition.

Krasner in the Exhibition’s Frame

The review puts Krasner and Pollock together in the same museum exhibition, a pairing that invites readers to consider how the artists’ work is presented in relation to one another. Ives’s description signals that the show challenged her expectations, but the supplied summary does not state what those expectations were or how the exhibition addressed them.

That limit matters for readers deciding whether to visit or seeking a detailed account of Krasner’s place in the show. The newsletter establishes that Hyperallergic’s critic found the exhibition striking; its excerpt alone cannot support a fuller conclusion about the balance between the artists or the review’s interpretation.

Amazon

Lee Krasner oil painting prints

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

A Brief Newsletter Introduction

Hyperallergic presented the review within a broader newsletter that also covered the departure of Yaddo President Elaina Richardson after 26 years, an artist profile of Rana Begum, and other arts news. Bishara’s introduction called attention to Ives’s review of the Met exhibition but did not summarize its argument.

The source identifies Krasner’s Right Bird Left as a 1965 oil on canvas. It provides no further exhibition history, dates, venue details beyond the Met, or information about whether the show is currently open. Those details cannot be established from the supplied report.

““I’ve never seen an upending quite like this.””

— Lucy Ives, novelist and critic, as quoted in Hyperallergic’s newsletter

Review Details Still Missing

The supplied excerpt does not include the review’s full text, its publication date, or the exhibition’s title and dates. It also does not explain what Ives means by an “upending,” which works are included, or how the exhibition presents Krasner and Pollock. The newsletter caption for Right Bird Left does not confirm that the painting is on view.

The Full Review Adds Detail

Readers seeking Ives’s full argument or practical information about the exhibition will need the complete Hyperallergic review and the Met’s exhibition information. The supplied newsletter excerpt does not announce a next milestone or state how long the show will remain on view.

Key Questions

What is the news about Lee Krasner?

Hyperallergic highlighted Lucy Ives’s review of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Lee Krasner and Jackson Pollock show.

What did Lucy Ives say about the exhibition?

Ives wrote, “I’ve never seen an upending quite like this.” The newsletter does not explain what she means by that remark.

Is Lee Krasner’s Right Bird Left in the exhibition?

The newsletter identifies the 1965 painting in an image caption, but does not confirm that it is included in the Met show.

When is the exhibition open?

The supplied report does not give the exhibition’s dates or current status.

Source: rss

HALLOWEEN

Halloween Picks

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

Veks Van Hillik Suspends Fish, Insects, and Other Objects in Surreal Murals

Artist Veks Van Hillik has announced a temporary suspension of incorporating fish, insects, and other objects in his murals, citing artistic experimentation and ethical concerns.

Gordon Highlanders Museum Surges In Global Coverage

The Gordon Highlanders Museum has experienced a significant surge in international coverage, with 35 mentions in recent media analysis, highlighting increased global interest.

The Desecration Of DC: From A Giant Arch To A Nuke-proof Bunker, Trump’s Legacy-building Blingfest Is An Architectural Atrocity – The Guardian

Analysis of Trump’s controversial architectural projects in DC, including a giant arch and a nuke-proof bunker, reflecting his legacy-building efforts.

Queer Artists Say Tom Of Finland Foundation Has Lost Its Way

Forty-one former residents say program changes and staff layoffs at the Tom of Finland Foundation threaten its support for queer artists.